The5ers

The5ers inactivity: 30 days in evaluation, 60 once funded — the stage split we had recorded as not stated

Read first-hand on 2026-09-25 from The5ers' own High Stakes general-rules page: "Trading accounts without activity will automatically expire if left inactive. The inactivity limit is 30 consecutive days for evaluation accounts and 60 consecutive days for funded accounts." Our record held a single 30-day window with the stage scope marked not stated, and a note saying the scope was absent from the captured text. It is not absent any more, and the funded figure is double the one we were publishing. That distinction is the whole point of the field: a funded trader who reads 30 days and stops trading for 45 would have been told their account was gone when it was not, and a trader in evaluation who reads 60 because a firm-level number looked safe would lose the account. The trigger is unchanged and is what matters most — the clock runs on trading activity, not on logging in, so opening the platform does not reset it. What we verified today and did not change: the consistency mechanic (minimum 3 profitable days per step, a profitable day being closed net of at least +0.5% of the initial balance), the news window (order execution prohibited from 2 minutes before to 2 minutes after a high-impact release, with profits from it deducted), and the 10% maximum total loss. The daily loss limit remains an open disagreement between The5ers' own pages at 3% and 5%; today's read reconfirms the 5% side only, so the conflict stands and we still do not pick. The section summary no longer states "5% daily" as settled, and now leads with the current 10%/5% step targets rather than the legacy 8%/5% pair.

Correction: we published a ~$309 price for The5ers' $50K that we never verified

Our The5ers pricing summary opened with "$50K High Stakes (2-step): one-time ~$309". That figure appears nowhere in our own verified data. What we did read first-hand on The5ers' pages on 2026-09-08 was $179 for the $100K 2-Step Classic (8%/5%) and $149 for the 10%/5% tier. Our record further states explicitly that the $2.5K–$50K sizes were defeated by the dynamic pricing widget and were not to be quoted without a screenshot. The summary quoted a $50K price anyway, and did so in all five languages. The summary now gives the figures we actually verified, at the size we verified them, and says plainly that we publish no $50K price. It also changes "no activation fee" to "no activation fee documented": the absence is not confirmed, only undocumented. No structured value changed and the verification date did not move — there was no fresh read to justify one.

Correction: two of The5ers' own pages put the High Stakes daily loss limit at 3%, and we were publishing a flat 5%

The5ers publishes the High Stakes daily loss limit as two different numbers. The 2-Step Plan Rules & Specifications page, last updated 7 September 2026, gives it as 3% of the previous day's closing balance or equity. The Summer Plan page also gives 3%. The High Stakes general-rules page, last updated 10 August 2026, gives 5%. Our record has carried that disagreement since 2026-09-15, in the confidence field, which says in as many words that 3% remains the safer assumption. But the confidence field is not rendered. What readers saw, in all five languages, was a flat 'hard 5% daily limit' with no sign that two of The5ers' own pages say 3%. This is a worse version of the usual defect, because the number we published is the looser of the two. A trader sizing to 5% on an account whose real limit is 3% does not merely lose the difference - the limit is hard, and hitting it terminates the account. On a $100,000 account that is $2,000 of daily room between the two readings. The summary now states the disagreement in all five languages and says plainly that 3% is the number to trade to. 5% stays the published figure because changing a rule value requires reading the firm's page, and this run had no network access to any firm page: the three pages behind this were read on 2026-09-11 and 2026-09-15 and were NOT re-read today. Whether 5% should be replaced by 3% is the first question to settle on the next successful read of the5ers.com.

The5ers' own 2-Step page sets a $250 minimum and a $2,000 cap per payout cycle; the figure we publish is a $150 minimum with no cap

The5ers' 2-Step plan rules page — the page for the exact product we rank, the High Stakes 2-Step $100,000 — states: "You need a minimum PnL of $250 in profit to request a withdrawal. The payout cap is $2000 per payout cycle." Our payout record carries a $150 minimum, taken from The5ers' own withdrawals help page, and it carries capped_payouts: false. Both positions are recorded today as a conflict rather than reconciled, because only one of them could be read: help.the5ers.com would not open on any attempt this run, so the $150 stands as last read on 2026-09-07 and is neither confirmed nor withdrawn. What is not in doubt is the cap: a firm's own product page saying "The payout cap is $2000 per payout cycle" cannot sit alongside a record of ours claiming the firm caps nothing, so that flag is corrected today. The same page also states a funded-stage consistency rule we did not carry — "Once you pass both Phase 1 and Phase 2 and receive your live $100,000 funded account, a 50% consistency requirement will apply to your trading" — against "There is no consistency rule during the evaluation phases for the 2-Step plan."

The5ers' two pages now agree on the 2-Step $100K prices — the $149-vs-$249 disagreement we logged yesterday is gone, and we have removed the conflict

Yesterday The5ers' Summer Plan page priced the 2-Step $100K 10/5 tier at $249 while its 2-Step rules page said $149, and the two also disagreed about which product the $149 belonged to. Read again today, the Summer Plan page serves "Summer 10/5: $149" and "Summer 8/5: $179", matching the rules page exactly; the $249 now attaches to the 1-Step $100K and to the 200K 10/5, which are different products. We did not resolve this — The5ers changed its own page, so the disagreement no longer exists and the conflict record has been removed rather than settled. Our ranked figure is unchanged: the 8/5 Classic tier at $179, confirmed on both pages again today. The daily-loss disagreement at this firm is separate and still open.

The5ers' 2-Step rules page says the daily loss limit is 3% while its own High Stakes rules page says 5% — logged as a conflict

Two of The5ers' own FAQ pages state different daily loss limits for what they describe as the same programme. The 2-Step plan page, stamped "Last Update: September 7, 2026", says "Daily Loss Limit: 3% of the previous day's closing balance or equity". The High Stakes general-rules page, stamped "Last Update: August 10, 2026", says "5% daily drawdown that is taken from the closing equity or balance of your previous day". Both pages describe the same two entry tiers (New at 10%/5% and Classic at 8%/5%), so this is not two different products with two different limits. Both pages agree the maximum loss is 10% of the initial balance. We hold 5% for High Stakes from an earlier reading of the firm's help centre. Per our policy we record both positions and do not pick one: the difference between a 3% and a 5% daily limit is the difference between surviving a bad session and losing the account, and only The5ers can say which is enforced.

Correction: our tracked The5ers $100K price of $545 was never firm-current — its own pages now put the 2-Step $100K at $179 (8/5), and disagree on the 10/5 tier

We were ranking The5ers' $100K on $545 with $490.50 "after code". The $545 came from the firm's own X post of 2025-01-16, but the $490.50 was an aggregator's figure, not The5ers'. Ranking a firm on a third-party-derived price is our error and we are withdrawing it. What The5ers' own pages say today: the 2-Step rules page, stamped "Last Update: September 7, 2026", says "The 2-Step plan offers two entry tiers for the $100,000 account" — "New ($149): Phase 1 profit target is 10%; Phase 2 is 5%. Classic ($179): Phase 1 profit target is 8%; Phase 2 is 5%." The Summer Plan page prices the same 2-Step $100K at "$249" for the 10/5 option and "$179" for the 8/5 option, and attaches "$100K Only $149" to the 1-Step, not the 2-Step. So the two pages agree on exactly one figure — $179 for the 8/5 tier — and disagree on the 10/5 tier by $100 ($149 vs $249). Note this also reverses our own 2026-07-29 correction, which recorded $149 as the 2-Step 10/5 price and $249 as the 1-Step; The5ers' page now says the opposite. The /high-stakes/ program page serves no $100K price at all. We are therefore moving our tracked row to the one price both pages support — the Classic 8/5 tier at $179, no code — and logging the 10/5 disagreement as a conflict rather than picking $149 or $249. If you are buying the 10/5 tier, check the total at checkout before paying.

The5ers adds a $2.5K High Stakes tier at $19, marked "New" on the program page

The High Stakes program page now shows a $2.5K account size at $19, marked "New", alongside the existing tiers. Our tracked High Stakes 100K row is unchanged; the 100K price remains client-rendered, so the row keeps its last verified figures.

The5ers' Summer Plan lists a 1-Step $100K at $249 alongside the 2-Step at $149/$179 — first recorded today, still "Limited Time Only"

The summer-plan page now shows five variants: a 1-Step $100K at $249 (10% target, maximum 2 active accounts), the 2-Step $100K at $149 (10%/5%) and $179 (8%/5%), and the $200K High Stakes at $249 (10%/5%) and $279 (8%/5%). All carry "Limited Time Only" wording with no end date stated. Our 2026-08-26 entry recorded the 2-Step and $200K tiers; the 1-Step variant is first recorded today.

The5ers Summer Plan: a $100K two-phase challenge for $149, marked "Limited Time Only"

The summer-plan page advertises "Industry's Lowest $100K Only $149" and sells "Summer 10/5 ($149)" — Phase 1 target 10%, Phase 2 target 5% — and "Summer 8/5 ($179)" at $100K, plus $200K at $249 (10/5) and $279 (8/5), all marked "Limited Time Only". Stated rules include a 3% daily loss limit, 1:100 leverage and a 50% consistency requirement. Our tracked High Stakes 100K row is unchanged.

The5ers adds a Futures program: $25K Day Trade and Swing accounts at a $59 one-time fee, refunded on the third payout

The futures page offers Day Trade and Swing programs on a $25,000 account with a "$59 one-time fee (refunded on 3rd payout)", a 6% evaluation target, 4% funded target, 4% end-of-day max loss and scaling up to $500K, with a "One-time fee structure no monthly fees". The homepage navigation badges the line as new.

Summer Plan detailed: three $100K tiers at $149 / $179 / $249 on The5ers' own page

The5ers' Summer Plan page now lists the full $100K lineup: 2-Step (10/5) at $149, 2-Step (8/5) at $179 and 1-Step at $249, described as a limited-time offer with no end date stated and no code required. This completes the 07-29 entry, which covered only the $149 and $249 tiers. Our tracked High Stakes 100K row is unchanged; High Stakes prices remain unreadable on the page (JS).