Bulenox

Correction: our Bulenox drawdown summary did not mention that Bulenox's own pages give the Fast Track $50,000 two different drawdowns

Bulenox's pricing page gives the Fast Track $50,000 a $2,500 drawdown and names no daily loss limit; its Fast Track help article gives $2,250 on both risk models and adds a $1,200 daily loss limit and a 4-mini cap on Option 2. Our record has logged that since 2026-09-08 and the conflict card renders, but the summary beside it gave only the size range and never mentioned the $50,000 disagreement. Sizing off the pricing page alone can put you over a limit you did not know applied. The summary now states both positions and says to size to $2,250. No rule value changed. Neither page was re-read today: this run had no network access to any firm page.

Correction: Bulenox caps its first three payouts by account size; the record we published said it capped nothing

Our Bulenox payout record carried the cap field as uncapped. The prose inside that same record, read first-hand from Bulenox's own Master Account help centre on 2026-07-21, describes a full per-size ladder: "Payout caps on first 3 payouts" at $25K $1,000 / $50K $1,500 / $100K $1,750 / $150K $2,000 / $250K $2,500. This is our error, not a change by Bulenox: the boolean was derived on 2026-07-28 from the split and minimum prose only, while the cap figures live in prose that derivation never read. What it costs in practice: on a $100,000 Master Account each of the first three payouts releases at most $1,750, however far above the $3,100 safety threshold the balance sits. A trader reading "no cap" would plan the first three withdrawals at several times what they can actually take, and Bulenox's own transition rule makes those first three the ones that matter — the move to a live account is offered after three Master payouts. Scope and date: this corrects our own derived field from evidence already verified on 2026-07-21. Bulenox's page was not re-read today — no firm page could be read today — so the payout record's verified date stays at 2026-07-21 and this entry does not assert Bulenox's state as of today.

Correction: the drawdown we published for Bulenox was also the Qualification account's, not the Fast Track's that we rank

Yesterday we corrected Bulenox''s daily loss limits for this same reason. Today, with the Fast Track page rendering its tables again, the same root shows up in the drawdown. We published a ladder running from $1,500 at $25,000 up to $5,500 at $250,000. Bulenox''s Fast Track page, read first-hand today, gives a different one: $25,000 "$1,000", $50,000 "$2,250", $100,000 "$4,000", $150,000 "$5,500" — identical under Option 1 (trailing) and Option 2 (end of day), and with the same one-time fee on both ($338 / $488 / $648 / $788). The tell is the same as yesterday''s: our ladder included a $250,000 size that Fast Track does not sell. On two sizes the difference runs against the trader and is not small. At $25,000 we published $1,500 of room when it is $1,000, a third less. At $100,000 we published $3,000 where Fast Track gives $4,000 — we were publishing a stricter account than it is. The $50,000 stays as it was, in open disagreement: the help centre says "$2,250" and the pricing page "$2,500". Both are Bulenox''s, we pick no side and keep both positions with their dates. We publish $2,250, which is today''s reading on the product''s own page and the tighter of the two. The Qualification account''s figures stay in the record, now labelled as its own and explicitly marked not re-verified: that page returns HTTP 200 but its tables have not rendered since 8 September, so its numbers remain the 21 July reading. We neither delete them nor treat them as current. We also confirmed verbatim today the daily-loss table we corrected yesterday: Option 1 carries no daily-limit column at all, and Option 2 gives "no daily loss limit" at $25,000, "$1,200" at $50,000, "$2,500" at $100,000 and "$3,300" at $150,000.

The daily loss limits we publish for Bulenox are the Qualification account's, not Fast Track's — and Fast Track is the account we rank

Bulenox's Fast Track help page, read first-hand today, sets out its own daily ladder under Option 2 (the end-of-day plan): $25,000 carries "no daily loss limit", $50,000 "$1,200", $100,000 "$2,500" and $150,000 "$3,300". Option 1, the trailing plan, carries no daily loss limit at any size. The figures we have been publishing — $400 at $10,000 rising to $4,500 at $250,000 — come from a different page, /help-center/qualification, and they include two sizes ($10,000 and $250,000) that Fast Track does not sell. The Bulenox product we rank is the Fast Track $50,000, and for it Bulenox's own page says $1,200, not the $1,100 we published. Today the record is rewritten so that the Fast Track ladder is attributed to Fast Track and the Qualification figures are attributed to the Qualification account. We have not merged them and we have not picked between them: the Qualification page's table did not render on any read today, so its figures stand as last read on 2026-07-21 and are not treated as re-verified.

Bulenox has a second contradictory price ladder, now on Momentum: its help centre charges more than its pricing page at every size

We already had it on record that Bulenox publishes two different prices for the Fast Track 50K ($175 on the pricing page, $488 in the help centre). The same disagreement now appears on Momentum, and it is not the same number repeated. The pricing page serves Momentum in two sizes only: $100,000 at "$215" and $150,000 at "$325". The help centre serves four: $25,000 at "$94", $50,000 at "$143", $100,000 at "$248" and $150,000 at "$358". So the help centre charges $33 more on the 100K and $33 more on the 150K, and additionally sells two sizes the pricing page does not offer. Both ladders are Bulenox's own and neither presents itself as a discount of the other. We do not pick a side. With two products now disagreeing with themselves, Bulenox's true cost cannot be computed from its own pages: check the total at checkout.

Bulenox's pricing page and its help centre give different drawdown figures for the same Fast Track $50,000 account, and the pricing page omits the daily loss limit entirely — logged as a conflict

On the pricing page the Fast Track $50,000 shows a $2,500 drawdown, a $3,000 target, a 7-contract limit and "Minimum trading days: None". In the help centre the same account is documented twice, as Option 1 trailing and Option 2 end-of-day, both with a $2,250 drawdown, and the end-of-day option carries a $1,200 daily loss limit and a 4-mini contract limit. So the two pages differ by $250 of drawdown room, and a trader reading only the pricing page would not know that a daily loss limit exists on one of the two risk models, or that the contract limit changes with it. This sits on top of the $175-versus-$488 price disagreement on the same account, which is unchanged today. We are not picking a side on either. The permanent code BULENOX still states no percentage on any readable Bulenox page.

Bulenox prices the Fast Track $50,000 account at $175 on its pricing page and at $488 in its own help centre — logged as a conflict

Bulenox's pricing page lists the Fast Track $50,000 tier as "$175one-time", alongside Qualification "$145one-time", Momentum $100,000 "$215one-time" and Momentum $150,000 "$325one-time". Bulenox's own help centre gives a different Fast Track ladder for the same product: $25,000 "$338", $50,000 "$488", $100,000 "$648", $150,000 "$788", described as "The purchase price is a one-time, non-refundable fee: there is no activation fee and no monthly subscription". Neither page presents one figure as a discount of the other — there is no strike-through, no "was", and no promo label on either ladder. We track $175 because that is what the pricing page shows, and we are recording the disagreement rather than resolving it. This matters for anyone comparing costs: $313 separates the two figures on the 50K alone. Related: Bulenox's always-on code BULENOX still states no discount percentage on any page we can read, so neither ladder can be reconciled by applying it.

Bulenox lists a permanent coupon code BULENOX for all account types — the discount amount is not stated on the page

Bulenox's own pricing page states a permanent coupon code BULENOX valid for all account types with no expiration; the homepage calls it a launch offer for Qualification, Fast Track and Momentum Qualification accounts. Neither page states the discount percentage or a discounted price, so no code is attached to our Fast Track 50K row — it keeps the $175 list price until the discounted amount can be verified on the firm's own checkout.

Bulenox relaunches its product line: named tiers with one-time 30-day pricing replace monthly subscriptions; $50OFF is gone, launch code BULENOX arrives

The accounts-pricing page now sells four named tiers — Qualification 25K "$145one-time", Fast Track 50K "$175one-time", Momentum 100K "$215one-time" and Momentum 150K "$325one-time" — each marked "Access valid for 30 days", replacing the monthly-subscription ladder (50K was $175/month, often $125 with $50OFF) still rendered on 2026-08-20. The help centre is reorganized around the new names (Qualification / Fast Track / Momentum / Master / Funded); the old /help/ pages return 404. A single code "BULENOX" is shown site-wide ("Copy it and apply it at checkout — this code never expires"; the homepage calls it a "Launch offer") with no discount amount stated on any readable page — checkout is not statically readable. Trading parameters of the tracked 50K tier are unchanged: 7 contracts, $3,000 target, $2,500 drawdown. Our offers row now tracks Fast Track 50K at the $175 one-time list price with no code applied, because BULENOX's amount is not stated.

Code $60OFF live for the $100,000 tier on Bulenox''s homepage

Alongside the tracked $50OFF for the 50K tier ($175→$125/mo), Bulenox''s own homepage lists code '$60OFF' for the $100,000 tier. Transcribed from the firm''s homepage; our tracked 50K Option 1 row is unchanged.